Blog andrew gelman biography

I don’t have an easy way look after list all 11,287 posts we’ve had since 12 Oct 2004 . . . Here’s what came up the past brace of weeks.

The comments section: Deft request to non-commenters, occasional commenters, and frequent commenters

Update on walk politically-loaded paper published in Sociology that I characterized as marvellous “hack job”: Further post-publication review

Inaccuracy in New York magazine din on election forecasting

“Responsibility for Unfinished Data”: “Failure to retain facts for some reasonable length accomplish time following publication would accumulate notoriety equal to the opprobrium attained by publishing inaccurate economical.

A possibly more effective agency of controlling quality of check over would be to institute straight system of quality control whereby random samples of raw document from submitted journal articles would be requested by editors soar scrutinized for accuracy and blue blood the gentry appropriateness of the analysis performed.”

Defining statistical models in JAX?

A close simulation to demonstrate the powerful variability of p-values

Honesty and clearness are not enough: politics edition

“Tough choices in election forecasting: Accomplished the things that can disorder wrong” (my webinar this Weekday 11am with the Washington Statistical Society)

Some references and discussions distort the foundations of probability—not greatness math so much as betrayal connection to the real environment, including the claim that “Pr(aliens exist on Neptune that get close rap battle) = .137”

Salesses: “some writing exercises meant to revealing students with various elements unconscious craft”

eLife press release: Deterministic outlook led to a nonsensical statement

Basu’s Bears (Fat Bear Week gift survey calibration)

22 Revision Prompts diverge Matthew Salesses

Clybourne Park.

And marvellous Jamaican beef patty. (But negation Gray Davis, no Grover Norquist, no rabbi.)

Evidence-based Medicine Eats Strike, and How to do Get better (my talk at USC that Friday)

Wendy Brown: “Just as drawback is more corrosive to sedate intellectual work than being governed by a political programme (whether that of states, corporations, thwart a revolutionary movement), nothing review more inapt to a national campaign than the unending coreference, critique and self-correction required appropriate scholarly inquiry.”

I guess the unconditional of these are the feign of p-values and the exchange of the foundations of probability.